Gear Review: Dan Durston XMid 1P Vs. Nemo Hornet 1P

Dan Durston’s XMid 1P Vs. Nemo Hornet 1P Tents

So I was working on my gear as you might have seen on here, and I settled, after much debate on the Nemo Hornet 1P, after I found a screaming hot deal with Valhalla Pure, getting the tent for $359 instead of $449. I discovered its footprint size and price per ounce was more favourable than just about anything I could order in from across the border like Gossamer Gear or Zpacks.

So I grabbed it on sale…

Then I came across Dan Durston’s XMid 1P.

I would always rather support Canadian-based design than USA – the market is so much smaller and the guy designed it for the Great Divide Trail, a trail I desperately want to do. I looked it over online and I loved the double vestibule and neat innovations like the parallelogram floor. No poles means lighter right?

I signed up for the drop thinking it would be a while before it came available again. Then it did – sooner than I thought.

Now I have two tents. What to do? Compare them of course!

By spec, the price is more expensive for the Nemo (unless it’s on sale like I got mine). The weight title goes to the XMid, but only by 60 grams which is like 4 tablespoons of sugar. Floor size goes to the Nemo, at 22 square feet compared to the Xmid’s 16.8 (though when I actually tried them out… read on for more).

Dan Durston XMid 1P

Nemo pitched next to XMid
First pitch of either, so if the XMid looks a little sloppy call it a learning curve – never used a poleless shelter before!

I set up the XMid quite quickly though the fly and floor were separated and I had to puzzle for a second to see how they linked together. I also spent a few moments figuring out how to even out the sizes through adjusting pole heights and such. I ended up using all 8 pegs included, though I have seen claims you don’t need them all.

The material the tent is made with feels strong and light, and the build quality looks good. I didn’t notice any flaws in manufacture. The pegs are simple, titanium and serviceable, and light (shaped like a shepherd’s crook). Once assembled, I was really impressed with the vestibule sizes and the spacious feeling on the inside. I laid out my Klymit Static V UL pad and Eureka bag to see how they would fit and no problems, with room to spare – I am 6’1″ and I had at least a couple inches top and bottom laying on my back. I also noticed the large ceiling storage sleeve – that would hold a lot of junk.

Once it was up it seemed very sturdy. I set it up in a 20km/h wind, and it went up fairly easily. With a little more practice I expect it would become much easier. I really liked this tent.

Nemo Hornet 1P

Then I went to the Nemo. You can tell Nemo has been in the biz for a long time – everything in this package spoke quality. The pegs were tough, like what you would buy aftermarket. The poles were feather light – they would have to be, as this tent is only 60g lighter than the poleless XMid! It uses a three pole design that feels more than adequate, since it’s only a 1 person tent.

Everything in the setup process was obvious. The hangers for the netting to the poles were innovative and easy to use. The clips at the corners connected the fly to the corners of the inners using a nifty system. It all went up with only 5 pegs – one for the fly to be tented out into a vestibule on one side. The vestibule was smaller than either of the XMid’s, but it was still adequate.

The materials this tent are made of feel like something out of science fiction. They felt like silk, only lighter. They were so much lighter than the XMid’s material I found myself questioning how durable they could be – but Nemo has a stellar reputation so I have to think this is just what top-of-the-line feels like. If the XMid had utilized this material it probably would have shaved off another 60-100g, just because the fly is so much larger on the XMid.

The interior felt satisfyingly roomy. There was a small transparent pocket at the peak for a headlamp to be stashed and a wall pocket for other miscellanea. Not quite as much storage as the XMid.


After setting up, laying in and tearing down these two tents side by side and in identical conditions, this I will say: both are excellent tents and I want to keep them both. However, my wife does not want me hoarding gear so I have to pick one to keep and one to sell. And my decision is: I’m going to keep the Nemo.

As I said, I love supporting Canadian, and a thru-hiker like Dan deserves the business. However, for my needs, Nemo scratches all my itches. Because it only costs me 60 grams, the benefits of a poled design which would be easier to manipulate in the field should I need to move its site, and the ability to skip the trekking poles if I wanted to, the adequate vestibule big enough for my pack no problem, and the roominess of the interior, I simply think it will do the trick in more situations.

However, you are not me. Consider the XMid for these reasons:

  • If you have a dog. The double vestibule means one side can be for Rover and one side for your pack. Simply awesome in that way.
  • If you aren’t a fan of closed-in spaces. The XMid feels like a 2 person tent or more on the inside because of the size of the vestibules and the distance of the fly from the interior.
  • If you are counting every gram and want to save 60g that badly. We are talking 2 ounces here.
  • If you don’t need a tent, like NOW. The Nemo is available in many outdoors stores, and online. The XMid is only available through (Formerly Massdrop) and even then only every once in a while based on demand. So if you have the time to wait, sign up for a drop and grab it when it comes available.


I originally wrote this review in 2019, and a number of details have changed since then. Last summer I actually had both tents out on Section B of the GDT – a good friend borrowed the Nemo and I used the XMid. I saw the difference in how the materials responded to dew, and the Nemo was soggy every single morning, with the fly often touching the mesh beneath, from the moisture causing stretch in the fabric. On the other hand, I never had problems like that with the XMid, due to its use of polyester materials. No stretch, little water retention.

Additionally, I got a dog. As such, the XMid is definitely my preferred tent now. If you are interested in obtaining one, the good news is Drop now sells them through Amazon, though availability is sporadic. DurstonGear also now sells 2p versions, if you would like more room within the bugnet, at a weight penalty.

Last note: the 1p has actually been updated. There are a number of tweaks made to it that improve upon the original design. A great resource for finding out more about Dan Durston’s products is this Facebook group.

3 thoughts on “Gear Review: Dan Durston XMid 1P Vs. Nemo Hornet 1P”

  1. Thanks for the review! Yeah the no-sag and no water absorption of poly fabric that the X-Mid uses is really nice. We use a 20D poly, so it is heavier than the 10D nylon that Nemo is using, but 20D is a nice step up in durability of 10D (we think it’s a good balance between light and durable).

    Going forward, Drop is stepping away from the outdoor market and the X-Mid will just be branded as a Durston product and increasingly sold on We’re working on increasing production but it’s been hard with new covid related factory shutdowns. So supply will be sporadic for the next year until we finally have increased production showing up. For folks that are interested we recommend signing up for the email notification list on because otherwise they’ll sell out quickly.

  2. Thank you for this side-by-side I find it very helpful and because of this I am now leaning toward the x-mis as well. I do have one question though: I have read that the footprint of the x-mid is rather large. Do you find this a problem when on the trail?
    Thankls; Marty

    1. My experience with tent pads is pretty much all in Canada, and the pads up here (where there are pads, and not simply open areas) are more than generous enough. The question with all trekking pole tents is more to do with staking and wooden tent pads, which I haven’t seen many here. With wood pads you need to figure out what can attach to the wood or have very long lines on the corners to reach earth.

      In using the Hornet, I have noticed that while the footprint is smaller, you simply get less. The Vestibule is miniscule compared to the XMid – barely enough space for a pack (I’d argue not enough at all), and in tight spaces or on wood pads the vestibule requires staking so that means it simply hangs on the inner which negates the benefit of the double wall. Worse, the nylon when saturated with morning dew is gross to pass in and out of (and unless it’s staked out and you’re careful, you are going to get slapped by it).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.